D.C. Terror Scare Ruled as “Hit and Run”

On June 8, 2017 two D.C. police officers on bicycles were hit by a speeding white truck that appeared intentional. When observing the vehicle following a crash and apprehension of the driver and passenger, an AK-47 semi-automatic long gun was found in the back seat of the vehicle. Later, the gun was erroneously described in the media as a “military style weapon”.

Given the horrific situation as briefly described, it is understandable to make the comparison to other recent attacks “inspired” by the Islamic State from around the world. This event was not the result of what is normally defined as planned terrorist activity.

Will this kind of terrorism happen here in the United States?

Although a method of using vehicles for “terror” was revealed using remote viewing years ago, I remain certain that the stated event along with any other means by which terrorism can occur within the United States can be prevented. That is, a limit can best occur when bringing today’s coordinated sources of intelligence into the fold with the most talented of viewers capable of accessing a non-historical source of information.*

Unfortunately, there remains an unreasonable perception that viewers such as myself are in some way inconsistent.
I can assure you that we are anything but inconsistent.

When referring to “we” in this regard, it must be stressed that although naturally talented viewers are rare, an extreme category remains. In this category, synesthesia and intellect will play a definitive role in the acquisition and analysis of information.

Presently, there exists no more than the potential for a combined effort between existing sources of intelligence and viewers capable of acquiring both historical and non-historical references.

This does not mean that viewing will be required in every situation. Rather, our intelligence services and technology is the very best in the world. Furthermore, the agencies involved employ some of the very brightest and most gifted of individuals assuring success in almost every conceivable situation.

Notice that I am referring to something that is conceivable rather than perceivable which implies the management of risk for which probability and efficiency is paramount. Remote viewing on the other hand can be tailored to look for what is missing and direct a search toward the highest probable outcome in any situation.

Given what we know, will there be an attack upon American soil under President Trump’s Administration?

As a viewer with data, I see the answer as most likely or “yes”.
Can the aforementioned event(s) be prevented?
The answer again is most likely.

*Historical information can lead toward a better understanding with respect to probability and until recently, this was the predominant source that viewers used to uncover a pattern. A non-historical source brings us closer to the horizon for which the event is most likely to occur within our own time-line. Limits are then presented with a higher degree of accuracy.