Tag Archives: Putin

Why President Putin Has No Interest in Influencing 2016 Elections

trump-hillary-final-get-along

As much as our pro-Clinton media projects untraceable motives behind cyber espionage, the unsuspecting public are expected to think that Russia’s President Vladimir Putin would love to see its geopolitical competitor represented solely by Donald Trump. This is blatantly false and here is why:

President Putin knows that unlike any other time in our history, approximately 35% of the American electorate will remain forever bitterly opposed to Clinton while many of the anti-Trump voters will remain discouraged, disillusioned, and ambivalent toward civil disobedience. That is, if Trump wins the election, it is well established that acceptance according to the order of law will inevitably occur. Should Clinton win, a very large segment of our society will never support her policies and will discretely rebel in the form of non-participation.* President Putin also knows that this situation divides our nation and significantly weakens its resolve in terms of foreign policy. A weak nation equates to a deeply divided nation whereas in Russia, the majority according to its culture, support a strong and charismatic leader.

On the other hand, we know that a Trump win will help to address Russia’s concern for the perceived dangers of Article V and NATO.

The mere suggestion by Hillary Clinton that our intelligence community (US) supports the notion of the Kremlin’s influence against her election is absurd. When “credible” intelligence is presented this close to an important national election, one should first suspect politicization. Secondly, we must all pause at the possible implications of a proxy cyber war between powers. Unsubstantiated claims of cyber espionage between Russia and the United States in this regard will undermine existing mutually beneficial programs. As it is now, we can all expect a shot across the bow…

To put it bluntly, President Putin has his own reasons to back either candidate equally without running the extreme risk of exposure sparking a cyber war. Should Secretary Clinton win, Putin wins as per a socially conflicted “Divided States” in which many will never accept the results of a highly contested national election between the sexes. It is also known that within the predominant patriarchal mythology of the west, Christians will “blame” Eve once again for man’s fall and they too will never accept a woman with her finger on the bomb. Should Trump win, it will be the Russian people in support of this decision and in turn President Putin will reach out with a positive gesture toward the west. It is in this way that the Kremlin will respond predictably as per the unknown potential for cultural acceptance rather than an ideological agreement.

While listening to President Putin in his own language, I find it disturbing that most if not all of the American media easily misrepresents exactly what is said within and often without the proper context.

*See also Gandhi’s use of non-participation that quickly led to India’s independence from an overwhelming force.

Update on January 2014 Predictions

By A.C.H.

As it was suggested for the January 2014 Predictions, Narendra Modi will win India as its next Prime Minister. This represents another “point of light” in which our world potential for balance occurs in ways that many should not have easily imagined prior to the aforementioned event.

On further notes concerning the 2014 Predictions:

  1. The Olympic Games of Sochi success for Russia’s President Putin has undoubtedly set the stage for a perceptual change. Western interest and influence throughout Europe has also changed due to necessity.
  2. Our planet’s ecological system remains burdened with the industrial demand associated with human over-population. Although peak child population levels are now established, this remains the subject of a statistical expectation that is more in line with catastrophic ecological collapse rather than sustainability.
  3. The frightening possibility of an effective biological weapon in the hands of extremists should now be observed.
  4. Former Secretary Hillary Clinton now stands as a most likely Democratic candidate for the Presidency provided that Mitt Romney remains out of the game in 2016. Presently, other headlining repugnican dinosaurs cling to nothing more than misguided nostalgia for a highly imagined past of religiosity, economic simplicity, global isolation, and the expected continuation of policies associated with primal fears. The best chance for a Republican win in 2016 must include a moderate female candidate to run alongside of Romney. Beyond this, Hillary has little competition when thinking of the average voter requiring an increase in sources of media driven stimulation.* The novel idea of a first female as Vice President or President of the United States matches a level of stimulation required beyond that of our first African American President.

*Please do not assume that a majority of human beings are complex but rather, we are simple automatons largely driven by the release of ever-more dopamine. The best politicians know this.