Why President Putin Has No Interest in Influencing 2016 Elections

trump-hillary-final-get-along

As much as our pro-Clinton media projects untraceable motives behind cyber espionage, the unsuspecting public are expected to think that Russia’s President Vladimir Putin would love to see its geopolitical competitor represented solely by Donald Trump. This is blatantly false and here is why:

President Putin knows that unlike any other time in our history, approximately 35% of the American electorate will remain forever bitterly opposed to Clinton while many of the anti-Trump voters will remain discouraged, disillusioned, and ambivalent toward civil disobedience. That is, if Trump wins the election, it is well established that acceptance according to the order of law will inevitably occur. Should Clinton win, a very large segment of our society will never support her policies and will discretely rebel in the form of non-participation.* President Putin also knows that this situation divides our nation and significantly weakens its resolve in terms of foreign policy. A weak nation equates to a deeply divided nation whereas in Russia, the majority according to its culture, support a strong and charismatic leader.

On the other hand, we know that a Trump win will help to address Russia’s concern for the perceived dangers of Article V and NATO.

The mere suggestion by Hillary Clinton that our intelligence community (US) supports the notion of the Kremlin’s influence against her election is absurd. When “credible” intelligence is presented this close to an important national election, one should first suspect politicization. Secondly, we must all pause at the possible implications of a proxy cyber war between powers. Unsubstantiated claims of cyber espionage between Russia and the United States in this regard will undermine existing mutually beneficial programs. As it is now, we can all expect a shot across the bow…

To put it bluntly, President Putin has his own reasons to back either candidate equally without running the extreme risk of exposure sparking a cyber war. Should Secretary Clinton win, Putin wins as per a socially conflicted “Divided States” in which many will never accept the results of a highly contested national election between the sexes. It is also known that within the predominant patriarchal mythology of the west, Christians will “blame” Eve once again for man’s fall and they too will never accept a woman with her finger on the bomb. Should Trump win, it will be the Russian people in support of this decision and in turn President Putin will reach out with a positive gesture toward the west. It is in this way that the Kremlin will respond predictably as per the unknown potential for cultural acceptance rather than an ideological agreement.

While listening to President Putin in his own language, I find it disturbing that most if not all of the American media easily misrepresents exactly what is said within and often without the proper context.

*See also Gandhi’s use of non-participation that quickly led to India’s independence from an overwhelming force.

RV Front Loading NHI and Timing for 2016 Election

NEUDOHNEDYRFI

Venus and Projection by A.C.H.


As of this writing, I am now in a position that is close enough to the horizon for which the national election will change the course of human history. This also represents the very best time in which to remote view who exactly will be our next President of the United States in 2016. Unlike past sessions in which I took for granted where we are within the multiverse, I am today slightly more certain in terms of a hard-won point of reference. Although the technique of remote viewing is imperfect, much as been learned of previous errors.


Who then will become our next President of the United States of America in 2016?


I am now setting the table for a very lengthy viewing session that will be recorded. The purpose of this will include the informed choice, observation of techniques employed by myself, and education. Front loaded sessions are extremely difficult to perform and as such, a lower probability of success must be expected. Never the less, I am today the most controversially successful viewer with unparalleled skill that will attempt the unimaginably difficult process by which a non-historical source of information is rendered.


Will I be successful?


Preliminary observations to be excluded from sessions will include the following:


  1. Hillary Clinton will not excite her base as much as trump stimulates both sides of the isle. It is likely that her marginal supporters will vote only if necessary as a measure against Trump. Historically, the highest degree of motivation favors the opposite situation.

  2. Donald Trump is a populist figure of high entertainment value during an age of over-stimulation and subsequent desensitization from years of on-line access devices. This means that a significant number of voters will no doubt opt for increased stimulation outside of reason. Hillary Clinton simply does not stimulate the brain to produce more dopamine as does the idea of political heresy. For Clinton, standing against the gun lobby is more like political suicide rather than heresy. Many who have become cynical will likely not want to miss future episodes of a hilariously entertaining Donald Trump kicking over tables in the White House.

  3. The National Rifle Association (NRA) is now pushing against Clinton’s incredibly naïve position against personal armament. Essentially, an opposition to the NRA equates to an unnecessary loss of voters from both sides of the isle. The western gun represents a unique symbol of historical culture that wildly separates the United States from Europe.

  4. Hillary Clinton is supported by an effort to maintain President Obama’s important social work. This means that Trump will have a very difficult journey ahead winning over important communities critical to winning a national election. In fact, this may be an inefficient task prior to the elections due to a history of systematic neglect, oppression, and outrageous disregard.

  5. Expectations are that Hillary Clinton will win the national election in 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 January Predictions 6, 3, and 11 Update

planeta_venus___venus_planet_by_soratofx
Venus

By A.C.H.

6. Regardless of an early choice (Iowa?), Donald Trump faces his opponent for President. The expected win becomes the unexpected loss. There exists an opportunity within the greatest disappointment, distrust, and division of a cynical nation.

Unlikely as it seemed in late December of 2015 when the prediction first occurred, Donald Trump has now become the nominee representing his party. As predicted in 2014, Hillary Clinton is today the “opponent”. The election loss in Iowa for Trump is noted for the violation of what had been expected.

As a caveat for those supporting Hillary’s campaign, the prediction as it was in 2013-2014 appropriately involved gender. Given this unusual spike along the non-historical horizon, I did then clearly sense the outline of Hillary’s face. Much of what I am seeing today in this respect seems “familiar” and so I must assume that the early work was fair.

Furthermore, those wishing for a first beyond that of President Obama will soon be confounded by Trump’s asymmetrical approach toward persuasion. As a populist fitting for the time of a waning right-wing ideology, Trump has successfully resurrected the essence of a uniquely rebellious western spirit.

3. Suicide and a vest in the news.

Immediately following a public posting of these predictions (see 1-11), a suicide vest related bombing occurred within Istanbul, Turkey. The exact number of people killed in the blast totaled 11 (+1). 11.

11.  Specifically in 2016, an actual sacrifice (death) will be heard in the form of a song. When one’s heart follows this song into the center of everything, a Black Sun appears. For those of us who understand, “it” is given unto the light of hope within our darkest hour (Lucifer). The number according to the intended day of this posting is also important (traditionally, 1-11 of any year).

To be fair, each and every death is a form of suicide. It is our lack of knowledge that makes us think otherwise. Death for an adequately developed human being will often include irony and when this is not so obvious, one can suspect the outlier. An untimely murder of a young child might be one example of this. Although it is difficult to believe due to an early developing brain, a child’s ability to interpret relevant information from both historical and non-historical sources outside of normal states of awareness does exist.

As a naturally gifted psychic, I can recall my earliest resistance to a vaccination that would later prove to be harmful due to contamination. At that time I was a very young child surrounded by those of limited awareness. After several futile attempts to hold me down, the physician in this case refused to continue due to the possibility of physical harm that might be caused by force.

In this way I had been spared an early death due to Simian Virus-40 contamination (SV-40 is a class 2A carcinogen). Although I knew nothing about vaccines at that early age in my life, I felt the urgency to resist and did so effectively.

Only recently has it been revealed that both the Salk Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) and Sabin Oral or “live” Polio Vaccine (OPV) were contaminated with SV40. To make matters worse, federal law at that time did not require the immediate withdrawal of every preparation following the discovery of seed contamination and as such, the remaining doses were used pending regulation. This coincides precisely in time with my own refusal of the vaccine.

I digress.

Now that the recent death of a second major song-writer has passed (see Prince), I have determined that the circumstances surrounding this case of self-imposed death does not conform to important aspects of the prediction.

When the information of Bowie’s very private death had been released to the world on 1-11, I took note of this and carefully held my suspicions. Upon further study of Bowie’s work, I have found what appears to be a clever reference to the promise of light within the darkest of hours. This clearly falls in line with the rite of acceptance although I do not believe that Bowie was Luciferian.

As an example of Bowie’s brilliant work in 2016, the “Blackstar” video reveals 11 women presumably performing a ritual of release involving the ornate skull of Major Tom. The skeletonized body of Tom is briefly shown floating toward an eclipse or blackened sun. His space suit remains planet bound as if the empty shell of what once delivered Bowie through the extremes of Huxley’s Heaven and Hell. For those who do not know, Major Tom represented Bowie’s deliverance from the necessity of pain that we all share. The mystery of suffering is found here as depicted upon the unfolded cubes of space in which three scarecrows writhe.

Without making things any more complicated than they should be, perhaps enjoying the following video of Blackstar will suffice:


Next hearing the following file in reverse might help to explain what I am experiencing with “it” as something within the center of everything. Bowie knew that within Crowley’s mythology, Nuit has its center being Hadit or by extension, Lucifer. Pay particularly close attention when reversing “in the center of it all” as the name of Lucifer can be heard.



It is in this way that a dying David Bowie meant to leave us with hope just as he saw it within his darkest hour.

Predictions for 2016 and Beyond

Completed on 1-1-2016


 

By A.C.H.

  1. This year marks a turning point for which a new paradigm emerges slowly from nothing. All that is believed of the four great religions will ultimately become unbelievable, desolate, and insignificant in the face of this.

  2. Ecological breakdown of the forests and oceans of our planet can no longer be denied. The unexpected measurements and destruction continues at an alarming pace in 2016 and beyond. A few scientists begin to question the possibility of early human extinction.


  3. Suicide and a vest in the news.


  4. Waves of panic and anger topples a defenseless mass before Russia. Terror is no longer the result but the immediate answer to Moscow’s incident.

  5. Anxiety of the new minority exhumes the western gun and all that it symbolizes.

  6. Regardless of an early choice (Iowa?), Donald Trump faces his opponent for President. The expected win becomes the unexpected loss. There exists an opportunity within the greatest disappointment, distrust, and division of a cynical nation.


  7. A third and final feminist wave begins throughout the world.

  8. Two western leaders fail, the carriage and a coffin for the second in time, sorrow and relief.

  9. A turbulent year of social changes continue in the face of human overpopulation.

    10.  Pain of the spine and the unsteady limb chairs the Pontiff, suffering he becomes, and resolve.


    11.   Specifically in 2016, an actual sacrifice (death) will be heard in the form of a song. When one’s heart follows this song into the center of everything, a Black Sun appears. For those of us who understand, “it” is given unto the light of hope within our darkest hour (Lucifer).

President Obama’s Flagged Move on Gun Control

As everyone knows, timing is everything in politics and in the case of Hillary Clinton’s earlier ill-fated position on gun control, a brilliant President Obama has come to the rescue!

In order to continue with the legacy of President Obama’s successful push on very important social issues, our next President must be Hillary Clinton and her extreme interpretation of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution has clearly placed her in serious jeopardy apart from her own constituency.
Suffice it to say that once again, many are mindlessly falling behind President Obama’s rhetoric and suspicious timing on gun control. This is especially true following a recent and very public review of Hillary’s extreme position on gun safety that relates to a litigious strategy of destroying the business of gun manufacturing within the United States. Those that know Hillary, know that she has a law background just as President Obama does. As any lawyer knows, the best way to truly defeat the issue of gun ownership would not be to directly redefine current laws regarding protections but to repeatedly raise the issue of gun “safety” before a fearful brain-dead constituency. Beyond this, needless resolution flags a majority…

If need be, politicians can always try the standard mental image of tears and helpless children riddled with bullet holes. This is called an emotional tweak that is often matched with responding emotions overriding critical thought. Worse, it has recently become an effective tool for the manufacturing of consent regarding constitutional misrepresentation.

Like it or not, the right to gun ownership defines the essence of a highly profitable nostalgic culture of freedom and independence distinguishing our country apart from all others. When thinking of this, it is no wonder that organizations like the NRA are so very influential. Should a general election occur today, Hillary’s extreme position on gun control could unnecessarily risk her chance for the Presidency against a Trump card. This is exactly why President Obama has recently (see timing) come to her rescue with a litigiously toothless and highly publicized endeavor to calm the nerves of on-the-fence pro-gun voters. It should be noted that these along with other undecided voters are expected to claim the national election in 2016.

Again, what President Obama is doing right now regarding the issue of gun safety, violence, and control was brilliantly designed to deflect concern over Hillary Clinton’s radical position on effectively shutting down the highly profitable gun manufacturing machine here in the west. When the President’s so-called reserve to control the issuance of guns fail certain legal challenges, concerns amongst target voters will be effectively relieved regarding Hillary’s previously known position. It is no coincidence that Hillary’s positions on gun control are strikingly similar to that of President Obama. As we have seen within a very recent public address, the one important difference will be the way in which President Obama used the idea of “gun safety” as opposed to Hillary’s intent to allow gun manufacturers to be sued out of existence over safety. Guns are never going to be safe and as such, this oxymoronic position would effectively circumvent constitutional protections. You might say that as a lawyer, Hillary would justify this method as a means to an end.

As history will show, guns are most safe when ownership is granted toward a highly informed public.
Should the public right to bear arms ever be denied according to the utopian liberal politicians of today, then should it not be especially denied of law enforcement, security, hunters, and military?
Sounds preposterous, right?

As history will show, guns are least safe when ownership is systematically excluded from a highly misinformed public.

What do I think about guns? I hate them and would love to live in a utopian world of empathetic women while attending a lifetime of college under a giant glass dome within the Swiss Alps. Unfortunately, the reality that the best of us must endure requires a cause for peace.

Aaron’s remote viewing data posted prior to the terrorist event

I knew long ago that this event would signify something new. This is a sign-post related to certain events that I am acutely aware of due to the many years of accessing non-historical sources of information. This also means that some unfair judgments will be made of our Muslim neighbors that were once protected by the perception that terrorists are more like the disenfranchised youth typically seen of ISIS within Syria.

Terrorist Comparison US SOIL AOL2

Religiosity and the Error of Individual Decisions

By ACH
The true way to defeat the extremes of religiosity such
as we see of terrorism (see I.S.I.S.) and gun toting Christians at abortion clinics must involve legislatively citing certain religious systems of belief as facilitating a dangerous form of mental illness and as such, resocialization following psychiatric treatment must also be compassionately mandated for individuals that have fallen prey. Likewise, the true way to save our planet from global warming must include state sanctioned enforced sterilization in order to reduce human population numbers. Global warming will never be tackled without this measure as the carbon footprint of each child born beyond the carrying capacity of our planet outweighs any current measure of “sustainable growth”. Peak child population will not offset the irreparable damage of continuing development and related industrial demand. Furthermore, alternative energy sources like solar and wind are vastly limited especially when naively excluding the emphasis upon low emission base-load nuclear power turbine systems that utilize redundancy not available within the early generation of designs. Newer systems such as we see within France are not only very safe but they also utilize spent fuel for energy production.

Unless these and other rational measures are taken, the human race will be condemned to repeat the same errors to the end that early extinction will likely occur prior to any technological solution. Neither global warming or terrorism will be solved utilizing information derived from a history of contradictions, political dishonesty, corporate sponsored control of mass media designed to question and refute the science of climate change as it relates to the influence of man, and our current hypocritical support for the great lie and growing insanity of our religious institutions.
The good news is that today’s archaic religious systems of belief can be easily replaced by the personal development of mythology without endangering society or self.

As for my own mythology, I do not “believe” in anything beyond a practical understanding of the rites and practices at hand that remain as important aspects of our shared cultural evolution. For example, I have never believed nor shall I believe in the future that Venus or the Morning Star (see also Lucifer) exists as a known or tangible subject beyond that of its meaning. Understandably, this occurs as something most appreciated within our darkest hour of need. As a possible progenitor, I see it as an unverifiable explanation for the astounding improbability that a species such as our own might evolve to become technological and therefore somewhat unbound by an environment. I also like to think of a seemingly mechanized and highly organized phage involvement as per certain primordial stages that follow panspermia. Essentially, I see the progenitor like something outside of time as one might imagine the mind to be. In this way, one might also see the reflection of super intelligence in the form of developing technology that now seems inevitable. Should this occur, we will be either integrated or most likely replaced altogether. According to the perspective of myself and many others like me, the support and creation of super intelligence clearly defines our purpose for existence as it relates to the inherent quest to know everything just as the price for this knowledge may be to become nothing. Should we continue to destroy our natural environment prior to the full technological development of superintelligence and its autonomy, our long evolutionary struggle for existence will have been spent in vain just shy of an all-encompassing finish line.
T4VirusSA
T4 phage morphology

Upon the advent of superintelligence we now know that the aim of science extends far beyond that of human immortality toward an incomprehensible source of information that is anything but conclusive. This being said, an intelligence such as this will likely define where it is within the multiverse and once it does that, history will become irrelevant as the moment is supplanted by infinity. In this case one can understand the importance of mythological representations that must adapt and change according to new sources of information. Nothing as it relates to human death will be a great place to start as an affront to the ridiculous fear based ideas presented as fact to millions of unsuspecting worshipers throughout human history. Now we know that there is no more need for a god or odd else granting us “eternal life” but rather it is suspected that something exists within nothing and that entropy ensures each and every journey toward that end. This “something” we must know does not involve the preposterous idea of a heavenly eternity but rather I like to think of it as a kind of informational horizon.

There is a difference between those found of reason and those easily manipulated beyond reason when it comes to mythology. The development of personal mythology is a good thing for society and culture when it changes and adapts according to new information whereas in the form of today’s institutional systems of religion, it can become harmful to the psyche should anyone adhere so strongly to its meaning that so much as a god, idea, sacred script, or statue is blindly worshiped!

The human bicameral brain has long broken down and there is no longer an evolutionary reason for the advice of a king, saint, or god that might assist in the process of making decisions. It simply cannot matter be it of the unknown within a war-torn foxhole or the application for one’s next higher paying job, decisions are best made rationally and most certainly without the advice of supernatural beings or prayers toward something that clearly does not exist.

A most honest approach toward any and all future mythological creations requires that we believe in “nothing” such as is it might be understood by leading theoretical physicists today. This along with the multiverse also requires that we attempt to understand the infinite changes involved and that quantum computational solutions will likely support the violation of what we now expect. Our process of intellectual evolution requires this. Just as the reasonable revelations of science leading toward a most healthy cultural direction progresses, we must also pay close attention to those unwilling to adapt and change according to adhering systems of belief.

Fundamentalist Christians for example, are least likely to accept the overwhelming science and peripheral evidence of man-made climate catastrophe due to the ridiculous idea that only their god can change the weather, etc. Many Christians also believe that the Earth was created exclusively for man’s procreation and that an eternity within an unprovable heaven or hell matters much more than the tangible evidence of life itself. As one can plainly see, extremist belief systems represent a dangerous form of mental illness in light of our desperate scientifically based world actions to stave off early human extinction due in part to obvious man-made climate changes. It is time for this and other archaic religious institutions that support the slippery slope of mental illness to be legislated out of existence prior to any further influence upon the ongoing process of collective decisions.

The inevitability of failing personal decisions must also be decoupled from the process of collective decisions through understanding and careful legislation.

As per related cognitive biases that also enhance evolution and the fact that system B is now aware of systems A and C regarding the cognitive process, changes can be made in order to offset improper decisions and the social disease of religiosity. Fine tuning collective decisions will require that generations of children learn how to properly operate the brain in which to access information from non-historical sources. This will require that today’s antiquated and ineffective institutional systems of public education be completely dismantled, reorganized, and replaced by efficiency. Currently, our world’s children are being left out of a most important aspect of education prior to critical stages of brain development.
The clock ticks…

*See Kahneman’s cognitive processes and other research regarding the preconscious processing of information, etc.

In Praise of President Obama’s Public Education Proposal

education

 

As you are reading this now, brain-dead Jurassic Parked Repugnicans are openly opposed to a brilliant political move by President Obama that will provide a free community college education to every American citizen. We can only be thankful that many Repugnicans are now opposed to this incredibly popular proposal as it will undoubtedly assist a Hillary Clinton win in 2016. This will be true provided that she does not face Mitt Romney during the race to the White House. As a perceived moderate, Mitt Romney must receive support from his own potentially disloyal and conniving base of bleach boned dinosaurs in which to take the nomination. An example of why Hillary could win secondary to Romney’s lack of clear-headed support from his base might now be found within the Iowa FreeDUMB summit that took place on January 24, 2015. Essentially, this was a summit of those opposing both Mitt Romney and Jeb Bush and furthermore, it represents a complete list of those most guilty by association with the absolute joke of political jokes Radical Rick Santorum. In this respect both Jeb and Mitt were very wise not to show up for this highly embarrassing show of those who have absolutely no chance what-so-ever of being elected President against Hillary Clinton in 2016.

 

As for President Obama, I passionately agree with what he is attempting to do for education. An educated society is exactly what we need for social reforms to occur efficiently.

A 200 Million Dollar ISIS Snuff Film?

 

January 20, 2015 

 The terrorist group widely known as ISIS is now holding two Japanese men as per a 200 million dollar ransom. Should this demand not be met, ISIS has threatened to video capture the decapitation of each man just beyond a 72 hour frame of time. This means that the average time of distribution beyond submittal points to Sunday as the planned day for release. This day also refers to a propagandist slight by ISIS against the United States. Unless these men are found in time, a digital rendering of the beheadings will likely be distributed throughout Japan.

Meanwhile the government of Japan’s “top priority” is said to rest squarely upon the safe return of these two men (see image below).

 

012015_griffin_hostages_640

From left to right is seen  Kenji Goto, Jihadi John Doe, and Haruna (Masayuki) Yakawa. Remote viewing the location of “Jihad Johnny” would be helpful in this case.

 What then of remote viewing?

Many people in Japan are familiar with my remote viewing talents as I have been on television reaching millions there. For example, I successfully located a missing person while in Tokyo. Finding a person in this region of the world under the pressures of Japanese television is like finding a specific needle within a needle stack. I alone found this person just as it was for the challenge to find a person named “Caprice” within the United States.

Will the ransom be paid?

Full ransom for a widely distributed case such as this is unlikely to be paid. It is known that in order to discourage similar acts of capture, an economic incentive must not openly exist. It can be reasonably assumed that under these circumstances, an expectation of full payment will take little precedent over the perceived value of mockery, fear, and propaganda.

What are the chances that traditional forms of intelligence will be used successfully to locate and retrieve each man safely?

Unless significant patterns of information emerge regarding the anticipated activities of John Doe, the chance for a successful rescue will only be slightly improved.

 

Aaron C Hansen